Philosophical Studies 177 (2):459-477 (2020)

Justin Bruner
University of Arizona
Matthew Lindauer
Brooklyn College (CUNY)
Social contract theorists often take the ideal contract to be the agreement or bargain individuals would make in some privileged choice situation. Recently, experimental philosophers have explored this kind of decision-making in the lab. One rather robust finding is that the exact circumstances of choice significantly affect the kinds of social arrangements experimental subjects unanimously endorse. Yet prior work has largely ignored the question of which of the many competing descriptions of the original position subjects find most compelling. This paper aims to address this gap, exploring how attractive experimental subjects find various characterizations of these circumstances of choice. We find evidence suggesting that no one choice situation can fulfill the role that social contract theorists have hoped it would play. We also find that, contrary to what some prominent social contract theorists have expected, there is no robust relationship between an individual’s ranking of distributive principles and their ranking of various descriptions of the original position. In conclusion, we discuss the broader implications of these results for political philosophy.
Keywords political philosophy  experimental philosophy  social contract theory  distributive justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1190-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Dover Publications.
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Contractarianism.Michael Moehler - 2020 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Marxist Dilemma for Social Contract Theory.James P. Sterba - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1):51 - 59.
Contract Law and Reasons of Social Justice.E. Voyiakis - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (2):393-416.
Evaluating the Veil.M. Meadon - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):171-177.
Continuing the Social Contract Tradition.Michael Keeley - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):241-255.
Minimizing Maximin.D. Clayton Hubin - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (4):363 - 372.
Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.
Recognized Rights as Devices of Public Reason.Gerald Gaus - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):111-136.
Locke’s Political Society.Michael Davis - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (2):209-231.


Added to PP index

Total views
390 ( #25,136 of 2,498,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,816 of 2,498,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes