Transmission for knowledge not established

Philosophical Quarterly 35 (139):193-195 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "Nozick on Scepticism", Graeme Forbes attempts to establish a Transmission Principle for knowledge which has been challenged by a number of anti-sceptical philosophers (such as Nozick). This principle (or something like it) seems to be required by Cartesian sceptical arguments, so if it could be refuted, this would apparently rid us of such scepticism. I do not believe that Nozick or anyone else has refuted the principle, yet I will argue that Forbes has certainly failed to establish it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and Scepticism.Robert Nozick - 1988 - In Jonathan Dancy (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Nozick on scepticism.Graeme Forbes - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (134):43-52.
Wright on Moore.José L. Zalabardo - 2012 - In Annalisa Coliva (ed.), Mind, Meaning, and Knowledge: Themes From the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford University Press. pp. 304–322.
Transmission Failure, AGM Style.Jake Chandler - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (2):383-398.
Testimony and lies.Dan O'Brien - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):225–238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
274 (#65,557)

6 months
2 (#652,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references