Shoemaker on second-order belief

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):361-64 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a number of papers, Sydney Shoemaker has argued that first-order belief plus rationality implies second-order belief. This paper is a critical discussion of Shoemaker's argument.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00318205

DOI

10.2307/2653514

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Shoemaker’s Problem of Too Many Thinkers.David B. Hershenov - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:225-236.
Shoemaker on second-order belief and self-deception.Byeong D. Lee - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (2):279-289.
Shoemaker, self-blindness and Moore's paradox.Amy Kind - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):39-48.
The possibility of absent qualia.Earl Conee - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (July):345-66.
Self‐Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
Thoughts on Sydney Shoemaker’s Physical Realization.Jaegwon Kim - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (1):101 - 112.
Shoemaker on self-knowledge and inner sense.Cynthia Macdonald - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):711-38.
Moore's paradox and the structure of conscious belief.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (1):99-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#196,199)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Self‐Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
How speckled is the hen?Bence Nanay - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):499-502.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references