Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):5-16 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral pluralism poses a foundational problem for secular clinical ethics: How can ethical dilemmas be resolved in a context where there is disagreement not only on particular cases, but further, on...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whose harm? Which metaphysic?Abram Brummett - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):43-61.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder Jr - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157 - 181.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157-181.
Is, Ought, and the Regress Argument.Jacob Sparks - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):528-543.
Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-30

Downloads
29 (#521,313)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Abram Brummett
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine

References found in this work

Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Null. Null - 2016 - Philosophy Study 6 (9).

View all 47 references / Add more references