Knowledge, evidence, and skepticism according to Williamson [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):436–443 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Timothy Williamson, where 'E' stands for evidence and 'K' stands for knowledge, E=K. He argues for the following theses, which jointly imply E=K

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Williamson on skepticism and evidence.Richard Fumerton - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):629-635.
Reply to commentators.Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):945-953.
Evidence= Knowledge: Williamson's Solution to Skepticism?Stephen Schiffer - 2009 - In Patrick Greenough, Duncan Pritchard & Timothy Williamson (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--202.
Why Williamson should be a sceptic.Dylan Dodd - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):635–649.
Interpretation and knowledge maximization.Aidan McGlynn - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):391-405.
Evidence and Knowledge.Clayton Littlejohn - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (2):241-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#122,239)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Importance of Being Rational.Errol Lord - 2013 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Some Evidence is False.Alexander Arnold - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):165 - 172.
What It's Like To Have a Cognitive Home.Matt Duncan - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):66-81.
Basic factive perceptual reasons.Ian Schnee - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):1103-1118.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references