- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Comments on the epistemological shoehorn debate
Science & Education 13 (3):197-200 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The epistemological imperative.B. Bright - 1989 - In Barry P. Bright (ed.), Theory and Practice in the Study of Adult Education: The Epistemological Debate. Routledge.
Epistemological Practice and the Internalism/Externalism Debate.James McBain - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):283-291.
The Principlism Debate: A Critical Overview.Richard B. Davis - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):85-105.
Allchin's shoehorn, or why science is hypothetico-deductive.Anton E. Lawson - 2003 - Science & Education 12 (3):331-337.
Lawson's Shoehorn, or Should the Philosophy of Science Be Rated 'X'?Douglas Allchin - 2003 - Science & Education 12 (3):315-329.
On the nature of transition-epistemological comments.P. Michel - 1994 - Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 96:213-224.
The debate on the Yan-yi relation in chinese philosophy: Reconstruction and comments.Bo Chen - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):539-560.
Ii how far does anything go? Comments on Feyerabend's epistemological anarchism.Tomas Kulka - 1977 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (3):277-287.
Epistemología, razonamiento y cognición en el debate historiográfico constructivismo vs reconstructivismo.María G. Navarro - 2011 - Universitas Philosophica 28 (57):163-187.
Comments on two epistemological theses of Thomas Kuhn.Abner Shimony - 1976 - In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 569--588.
The metaphysical realism debate: What is at stake?Tadeusz Szubka - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):301-316.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-18
Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)
6 months
2 (#1,232,442)
2014-03-18
Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)
6 months
2 (#1,232,442)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom.Douglas Allchin - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (9):1911-1932.
A Role for Experiment in Using the Law of Inertia to Explain the Nature of Science: A Comment on Lopes Celho.Calvin Kalman - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (1):25-31.
References found in this work
Science as practice and culture.Andrew Pickering (ed.) - 1992 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
On scientific thinking.Ryan D. Tweney, Michael E. Doherty & Clifford R. Mynatt (eds.) - 1981 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Planck's Principle.David L. Hull, Peter D. Tessner & Arthur M. Diamond - 1978 - Science 202 (4369):717-723.
What does Galileo's discovery of Jupiter's moons tell us about the process of scientific discovery?Anton E. Lawson - 2002 - Science & Education 11 (1):1-24.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo