Caring discourse: The care/justice debate revisited

Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):773-800 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethic of care has often been opposed to the ethic of justice as offering a different and even a contradictory approach to moral problems. This article argues that, from the perspective of the discourse ethic, both approaches are complementary in a very fundamental sense, since each one applies to one of two stages of moral reasoning that are as different as they are interconnected. It argues, in particular, that while justice is concerned with the justification and elaboration of norms, care is concerned with finding a solution for specific moral situations. The article then places considerations of care at the centre of ideal discourse and subordinates the importance of rational understanding and moral justification to intuitive communication

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
25 (#465,850)

6 months
2 (#300,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Moral Perception and Particularity.Lawrence A. Blum - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Moral perception and particularity.Lawrence Blum - 1991 - Ethics 101 (4):701-725.
Moral orientation and moral development.Carol Gilligan - 1987 - In Eva Feder Kittay & Diana T. Meyers (eds.), Women and Moral Theory. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 19--23.
The generalised and the concrete other.Seyla Benhabib - 1987 - In Eva Feder Kittay & Diana T. Meyers (eds.), Women and Moral Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.

View all 13 references / Add more references