Vote Buying and Tax-cut Promises

Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 63 (146):20-35 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both vote buying and tax-cut promises are attempts to manipulate voters through cash incentives in order to win elections, but only vote buying is illegal. Should we extend the ban on vote buying to tax-cut promises? This article will argue for three conclusions. The first is that tax-cut promises should be understood as a form of vote buying. The second is that campaign promises are a form of vote buying. The third conclusion is that campaign promises, including tax-cut promises, should not be banned. An important distinction is drawn between enforceable wrongful incentives and unenforceable wrongful incentives. The difference between vote buying and tax-cut promises is not wrongfulness but enforceability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vote Buying and Voter Preferences.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (1):107-124.
The Ethics of Voting.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Princeton Univ Pr.
Vote Markets.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):759-774.
Buying and buying into the ideal child.Anne Urbancic - 1998 - Semiotica 118 (1-2):91-104.
Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote.Jason Brennan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):535-549.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-02

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thom Brooks
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references