Foundations of Science 11 (4):399-418 (2006)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The formalism of abstracted quantum mechanics is applied in a model of the generalized Liar Paradox. Here, the Liar Paradox, a consistently testable configuration of logical truth properties, is considered a dynamic conceptual entity in the cognitive sphere (Aerts, Broekaert, & Smets, [Foundations of Science 1999, 4, 115–132; International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2000, 38, 3231–3239]; Aerts and colleagues[Dialogue in Psychology, 1999, 10; Proceedings of Fundamental Approachs to Consciousness, Tokyo ’99; Mind in Interaction]. Basically, the intrinsic contextuality of the truth-value of the Liar Paradox is appropriately covered by the abstracted quantum mechanical approach. The formal details of the model are explicited here for the generalized case. We prove the possibility of constructing a quantum model of the m-sentence generalizations of the Liar Paradox. This includes (i) the truth–falsehood state of the m-Liar Paradox can be represented by an embedded 2m-dimensional quantum vector in a (2m) m -dimensional complex Hilbert space, with cognitive interactions corresponding to projections, (ii) the construction of a continuous ‘time’ dynamics is possible: typical truth and falsehood value oscillations are described by Schrödinger evolution, (iii) Kirchoff and von Neumann axioms are satisfied by introduction of ‘truth-value by inference’ projectors, (iv) time invariance of unmeasured state.
|
Keywords | Philosophy Philosophy of Science Mathematical Logic and Foundations Methodology of the Social Sciences |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10699-004-6248-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Description of Many Separated Physical Entities Without the Paradoxes Encountered in Quantum Mechanics.Dirk Aerts - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (12):1131-1170.
Quantum Structures, Separated Physical Entities and Probability.Diederik Aerts - 1994 - Foundations of Physics 24 (9):1227-1259.
Intrinsic Contextuality as the Crux of Consciousness.D. Aerts, J. Broekaert & Liane Gabora - 2000 - In Kunio Yasue, Marj Jibu & Tarcisio Della Senta (eds.), No Matter, Never Mind: Proceedings of Toward a Science of Consciousness: Fundamental Approaches (Tokyo '99). John Benjamins.
The Liar-Paradox in a Quantum Mechanical Perspective.Diederik Aerts, Jan Broekaert & Sonja Smets - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (2):115-132.
Citations of this work BETA
A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations I: The Structure of the Sets of Contexts and Properties.Diederik Aerts & Liane Gabora - 2005 - Aerts, Diederik and Gabora, Liane (2005) a Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations I.
The Tacit ‘Quantum’ of Meeting the Aesthetic Sign; Contextualize, Entangle, Superpose, Collapse or Decohere.Jan Broekaert - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (2):255-266.
Similar books and articles
Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox.Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo & Emmanuel Genot (eds.) - 2008 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox.Robert Lazarus Martin (ed.) - 1984 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Liar-Paradox in a Quantum Mechanical Perspective.Diederik Aerts, Jan Broekaert & Sonja Smets - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (2):115-132.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
51 ( #224,305 of 2,519,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,857 )
2009-01-28
Total views
51 ( #224,305 of 2,519,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads