Signalling under Uncertainty: Interpretative Alignment without a Common Prior

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axx058 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Communication involves a great deal of uncertainty. Prima facie, it is therefore surprising that biological communication systems—from cellular to human—exhibit a high degree of ambiguity and often leave its resolution to contextual cues. This puzzle deepens once we consider that contextual information may diverge between individuals. In the following we lay out a model of ambiguous communication in iterated interactions between subjectively rational agents lacking a common contextual prior. We argue ambiguity’s justification to lie in endowing interlocutors with means to flexibly adapt language use to each other and the context of their interaction to serve their communicative preferences. Linguistic alignment is shown to play an important role in this process; it foments convergence of contextual expectations and thereby leads to agreeing use and interpretation of ambiguous messages. We conclude that ambiguity is ecologically rational when interlocutors’ contextual expectations are generally in line or they interact multiple times in an informative context, enabling for the alignment of their expectations. In light of these results meaning multiplicity can be understood as an opportunistic outcome enabled and shaped by linguistic adaptation and contextual information.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomena of Ambiguity and the Uncertainty of Language.Kai Xing - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:47-55.
Ambiguity Is Kinda Good Sometimes.Cailin O’Connor - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (1):110-121.
Ambiguity Is Kinda Good Sometimes.Cailin O’Connor - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (1):110-121.
What Is the “Context” for Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition?William J. Rapaport - 2003 - Proceedings of the 4th Joint International Conference on Cognitive Science/7th Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference 2:547-552.
Full alignment of some but not all representations in dialogue.Holly P. Branigan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
The Inscriptive Subject of Psychoanalysis.Karen Sue Evans - 1994 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Trust, authority and epistemic responsibility.Gloria Origgi - 2008 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (1):35-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-29

Downloads
32 (#431,738)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information.Brian Skyrms - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Lewis - 1969 - Synthese 26 (1):153-157.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David K. Lewis - 1971 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (2):137-138.
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.

View all 31 references / Add more references