The Monist 84 (1):60-76 (2001)

Current debates as to whether “republican liberty” is a negative or a positive concept of liberty take as their starting point the distinction between these concepts as outlined in Isaiah Berlin’s essay “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Berlin’s essay has stimulated a considerable debate about the precise nature of the distinction between the two concepts, whether there are indeed two concepts of liberty or only one, the triadic concept, and whether the two concepts are systematically connected to the foundational assumptions of different traditions of political philosophy. Republican liberty has traditionally been placed under the positive heading as one variant of positive liberty, but this has been challenged by the argument that republican liberty is a form of negative liberty which is more extensive than the liberal form of negative liberty in incorporating the notion of freedom from potential as well as actual interference or constraint. According to this interpretation, therefore, the main distinction between the political traditions of liberalism and republicanism is to be found not in the distinction between negative and positive liberty, but in a distinction within negative liberty.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI monist20018417
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

El neo-republicanismo y sus implicancias para las instituciones legales y políticas.Alba María Ruibal - 2009 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 30:81-100.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Non-Domination as a Moral Ideal.Christian Nadeau - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):120-134.
Invigilating Republican Liberty.Gerald Lang - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):273-293.
The Tension Between Law and Politics in the Modern Republican Tradition.Marco Geuna - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh University Press.
From Republican to Liberal Liberty.. Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
From Republican to Liberal Liberty.Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
The Limits of Neo-Roman Liberty.G. Maddox - 2002 - History of Political Thought 23 (3):418-431.
Republican Liberty Considered.M. M. Goldsmith - 2000 - History of Political Thought 21 (3):543-560.
Four Conceptions of Freedom.Horacio Spector - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (6):780-808.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #951,032 of 2,507,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes