Seeing the laws of nature [author's response to Norton, 1993]

Metascience 3:38-40 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Seeing the laws of nature.John D. Norton - 1993 - Metascience 3:33-38.
Laws of nature.John W. Carroll - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Laws and symmetry.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Models: The blueprints for laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Duncan Maclean - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.
Miracles and the laws of nature.Robert A. Larmer - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):227 - 235.
The Argument from Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
On laws of nature.S. Körner - 1953 - Mind 62 (246):216-229.
Lange’s Challenge: Accounting for Meta-laws.Zanja Yudell - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):347-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Robert Brown
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?John D. Norton - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.
The Annus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism.Yiftach Fehige - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (1):222-240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references