No Argument against the Continuity of Value: Reply to Dorsey

Utilitas 22 (4):494-496 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dorsey rejects Conclusion, so he believes he must reject one of the premises. He argues that the best option is to reject Premise 3. Rejecting Premise 3 entails a certain sort of discontinuity in value. So Dorsey believes he has an argument for discontinuity

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0953820810000373

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dualism and the argument from continuity.Eric Russert Kraemer & Charles Sayward - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (January):55-59.
Discussion the importance of continuity: A reply to Chris Eliasmith.Roman R. Poznanski - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (3):435-435.
Consequentialism, Metaphysical Realism and the Argument from Cluelessness.Dale Dorsey - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):48-70.
How (not) to attack the luck argument.E. J. Coffman - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):157-166.
Quinton's Neglected Argument for Scientific Realism.Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):393 - 400.
Disappearance and knowledge.Andrew D. Cling - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):226-47.
Discussions Quinton’s Neglected Argument for Scientific Realism.Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):393-400.
The argument for internalism: Reply to Miller.Michael Smith - 1996 - Analysis 56 (3):175–184.
In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument.Daniel Haas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):797-811.
Reconsidering Bohr's reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.
Characterising Near Continuity Constructively.Douglas Bridges & Luminiţa Vîţă - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):535-538.
The Argument from Motion and the Argument for Angels: a reply to John FX Knasas.T. J. Kondoleon - 1998 - The Thomist 62 (2):269-290.
Skeptical Parasitism and the Continuity Argument.Brian Ribeiro - 2004 - Metaphilosophy 35 (5):714-732.
A reply to McLachlan.J. Keown - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):255-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
114 (#152,686)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Broome
University Of Oxford

Citations of this work

Against internalism.Kieran Setiya - 2004 - Noûs 38 (2):266–298.
Moral priorities under risk.Chad Lee-Stronach - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):793-811.
Explanatory Injustice and Epistemic Agency.Veli Mitova - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):707-722.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references