Intellectual property, state sovereignty, and biotechnology

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (1):pp. 51-73 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The issue of biopiracy has attracted considerable attention in recent years. The Convention on Biological Diversity adopted a principle of state sovereignty over biological resources and the genetic information contained within those resources to address this issue. It is argued that this principle has not been adequately justified and that there are other solutions to the issue of biopiracy, based on different theories of justice, that deserve greater consideration. These alternatives include the common heritage of mankind principle and the global commons principle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law and sovereignty.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (5):535-569.
Intellectual property and biotechnology: The european debate.Baruch A. Brody - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):69-110.
Traditional knowledge and intellectual property.Baruch A. Brody - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):231-249.
On the Value of the Intellectual Commons.James Wilson - 2012 - In New Frontiers in the Philosophy of Intellectual Property.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-12

Downloads
243 (#79,264)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Baruch Brody
PhD: Princeton University; Last affiliation: Rice University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references