Intellectual property and biotechnology: The U.s. Internal experience--part II

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):105-128 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Continuing the discussion begun in the March 2006 issue of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, this paper further documents the failure of the United States to adequately consider possible modifications in the traditional robust system of intellectual property rights as applied to biotechnology. It discusses concrete suggestions for alternative disclosure requirements, for exemptions for research tools, and for improved access to clinical advances. In each of these cases, the modifications might be more responsive to the full set of relevant values

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#329,731)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Baruch Brody
PhD: Princeton University; Last affiliation: Rice University

Citations of this work

Ethical reasons for narrowing the scope of biotech patents.Tom Andreassen - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):463-473.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references