Fate, Philology, Freud

Philosophy and Literature 38 (1):1-29 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Oedipus’s basic error was to have viewed evil as a problem, whereas he learns to his grief that it is actually a mystery, an irresolvable paradox, a natural contradiction between the mutually exclusive possibilities of self-determination and predetermination, between freedom of the will and divine omniscience. This is the quandary as it is perceived by philosophy and religion. In the domains of religion and theology Fate is indeed a mystery. Ill-equipped as I am to elucidate mysteries, I will move the discussion to a firmer ground, where the concept of Fate is merely a problem, where scholars, those who “traffic in words,” as Goethe calls us, stand a fighting chance.1My major concerns will be: 1) to determine what ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fate and humanity.Xunwu Chen - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (1):67 – 77.
Freud's religion: Oedipus and Moses.R. Z. Friedman - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (2):135-149.
The concept of fate in mencius.Ning Chen - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (4):495-520.
On fate and fatalism.Robert C. Solomon - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454.
Fate, logic, and time.Steven M. Cahn - 1967 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.
Why me?: a philosophical inquiry into fate.Michael Gelven - 1991 - DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-19

Downloads
43 (#352,595)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references