Conway and Charleton on the Intimate Presence of Souls in Bodies

Journal of the History of Ideas 79 (4):571-591 (0035)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Little is known about the shaping and development of Anne Conway’s thought in relation to her early modern contemporaries. In one part of her only surviving treatise, The Principles, Conway criticises “those doctors” who uphold a dualist theory of soul and body, a mechanist conception of body (as dead and inert), and the view that the soul is “intimate present” in the body. In this paper, I argue that here she targets Walter Charleton, a well-known defender of Epicurean atomism in mid-seventeenth-century England. My intention is to highlight the sophistication of Conway’s theory of soul-body relations vis-a-vis that of Charleton.

Similar books and articles

Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World.Marcy P. Lascano - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (4):327-336.
What Could Pair a Nonphysical Soul to a Physical Body?Jaegwon Kim - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 335-347.
A dilemma for the soul theory of personal identity.Jacob Berger - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (1):41-55.
Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? [REVIEW]David Hershenov - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (2):237-242.
Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? By Nancey Murphy.Matthew Levering - 2007 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 7 (3):635-638.
There is No Trace of Any Soul Linked to the Body.David Papineau - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 369-376.
Leibniz and the Fardella Memo.Shane Duarte - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-13

Downloads
347 (#55,224)

6 months
70 (#60,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Broad
Monash University

Citations of this work

Reconciling Moral Responsibility with Multiplicity in Conway’s Principles.Hope Sample - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 31 (2):179-191.
Anne Conway on Divine and Creaturely Freedom.Hope Sample - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (6):1151-1167.
Suffering for Justice in Anne Conway and Maria W. Stewart.Timothy Yenter - 2023 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 61 (1):275-294.

Add more citations