A Tall Tale: In Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism

In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 197-220 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Insensitive Semantics (2004), we argue for two theses – Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. In this paper, we outline our defense against two objections often raised against Semantic Minimalism. To get to that defense, we first need some stage setting. To that end, we begin with five stage setting sections. These lead to the first objection, viz., that it might follow from our view that comparative adjectives are context insensitive. We defend our view against that objection (not, as you might expect, by denying that implication, but by endorsing it). Having done so, we address a second objection, viz., that Semantic Minimalism makes it difficult to see what role semantic content plays in communicative exchanges. We respond and end with a reversal, i.e., we argue that even though the second objection fails against us, it works against those who raise the objection. In particular, we show that Recanati ends up with a notion of communicated content that fails various tests for psychological reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberating Content.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Overview.[author unknown] - 2005 - In Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (eds.), Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell. pp. 1-14.
Index.[author unknown] - 2005 - In Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (eds.), Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell. pp. 215–219.
References.[author unknown] - 2005 - In Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (eds.), Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell. pp. 209–214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
151 (#128,482)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Herman Cappelen
University of Hong Kong
Ernie LePore
Rutgers - New Brunswick

References found in this work

.Ernest LePore & Brian P. McLaughlin (eds.) - 1985 - Blackwell.
Unarticulated constituents.François Recanati - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):299-345.

Add more references