"A great championess for her sex": Sarah Chapone on liberty as nondomination and self-mastery

The Monist 98 (1):77-88 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of liberty at the heart of Sarah Chapone’s 1735 work, The Hardships of the English Laws in Relation to Wives. In this work, Chapone (1699-1764) advocates an ideal of freedom from domination that closely resembles the republican ideal in seventeenth and eighteenth- century England. This is the idea that an agent is free provided that no-one else has the power to dispose of that agent’s property—her “life, liberty, and limb” and her material possessions—according to his arbitrary will and pleasure, without being accountable to the law. This paper shows how Chapone uses this ideal to ground her arguments against those laws that put married women in a worse condition than slavery, and to call for the establishment of reasonable and just safeguards for a woman’s personal property and property in her children. More than this, it is argued, in this text Chapone articulates a feminist ideal that is both negative freedom from domination and positive freedom to be one’s own master or arbiter. Her work thus occupies a unique—and hitherto unrecognized—place in the history of feminist philosophy.

Similar books and articles

Three Concepts of Political Liberty.Kyle Swan - 2003 - Journal of Markets and Morality 6 (1):117-142.
Women on Liberty in Early Modern England.Jacqueline Broad - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):112-122.
Another Instrumental Republican Approach?John Maynor - 2002 - European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1):71-89.
A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination.Rainer Forst - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mastery and Masters.Alan R. Drengson - 1983 - Philosophy Today 27 (3):230-246.
Ayn Rand and the Mastery of Nature.Gregory R. Johnson - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (1):229-240.
Liberty: One concept too many?Eric Nelson - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.
Nondomination and normativity.By Christopher Mcmahon - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):319–327.
Freedom, liberty, and property.Jonathan Wolff - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):345-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-01

Downloads
575 (#29,688)

6 months
83 (#50,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Broad
Monash University

References found in this work

Negative and positive freedom.Gerald MacCallum - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (3):312-334.
Negative Liberty, Liberal and Republican1.Philip Pettit - 1993 - European Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):15-38.
Introductory Note.Robert E. Butts - 1981 - Synthese 47 (3):355-355.

Add more references