Syntactic cut-elimination for a fragment of the modal mu-calculus

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (12):1838-1853 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For some modal fixed point logics, there are deductive systems that enjoy syntactic cut-elimination. An early example is the system in Pliuskevicius [15] for LTL. More recent examples are the systems by the authors of this paper for the logic of common knowledge [5] and by Hill and Poggiolesi for PDL[8], which are based on a form of deep inference. These logics can be seen as fragments of the modal mu-calculus. Here we are interested in how far this approach can be pushed in general. To this end, we introduce a nested sequent system with syntactic cut-elimination which is incomplete for the modal mu-calculus, but complete with respect to a restricted language that allows only fixed points of a certain form. This restricted language includes the logic of common knowledge and PDL. There is also a traditional sequent system for the modal mu-calculus by Jäger et al. [9], without a syntactic cut-elimination procedure. We embed that system into ours and vice versa, thus establishing cut-elimination also for the shallow system, when only the restricted language is considered

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cut-elimination and proof-search for bi-intuitionistic logic using nested sequents.Rajeev Goré, Linda Postniece & Alwen Tiu - 1998 - In Marcus Kracht, Maarten de Rijke, Heinrich Wansing & Michael Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. CSLI Publications. pp. 43-66.
A note on the proof theory the λII-calculus.David J. Pym - 1995 - Studia Logica 54 (2):199 - 230.
A calculus of substitutions for DPL.C. Vermeulen - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (3):357-387.
Aspects of analytic deduction.Athanassios Tzouvaras - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):581-596.
The modal object calculus and its interpretation.Edward N. Zalta - 1997 - In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 249--279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Intuitionistic common knowledge or belief.Gerhard Jäger & Michel Marti - 2016 - Journal of Applied Logic 18:150-163.
Small infinitary epistemic logics.Tai-wei Hu, Mamoru Kaneko & Nobu-Yuki Suzuki - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):702-735.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deep sequent systems for modal logic.Kai Brünnler - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):551-577.
Cut-free sequent calculi for some tense logics.Ryo Kashima - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (1):119 - 135.
Method of Tree-Hypersequents for Modal Propositional Logic.Francesca Poggiolesi - 2009 - In Jacek Malinowski David Makinson & Wansing Heinrich (eds.), Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Springer. pp. 31–51.

View all 8 references / Add more references