The Polarization of the Concepts Si (Private Interest) and Gong (Public Interest) in Early Chinese Thought

Asia Major 26 (2) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many scholars of early China agree that the fourth century bce witnessed a surge in intellectual interest in concepts that have been dubbed the self, “subjectivity,” the private realm, and the body. As such a sphere came into greater focus in intellectual circles, so did a new discourse that evaluated what it meant to benefit or deprive the self and its related parts. The famous statement purportedly by Yang Zhu 楊朱 (or Yangzi 楊子) that claims he was not willing to pluck out a single hair in order to benefit the world reminds us of such a discourse.2 Around the same time, there also emerged discussions that polarized various ideas of self and the private sphere (si 私), on the one hand, ver- sus the state and the public sphere (gong 公), on the other, especially in circles that concerned themselves with public policy and statecraft, but also more generally. These discussions formed a forceful counterpoint to the discourses involving human subjectivity and the body. Indeed, their open dislike of the influence of private, individual, and personal realms in politics strongly suggests that the statecraft writers were re- acting to and in dialog with those intellectuals who engaged discussion of subjectivity, the self, and its agencies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Public Interest to Political Justice.Richard E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):20-27.
Han Fei's doctrine of self-interest.Paul R. Goldin - 2001 - Asian Philosophy 11 (3):151 – 159.
Database Research: Public and Private Interests.Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):563-571.
Private Property and Public Interest.Michael Monahan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):17-21.
El interés público: Entre la ideología Y el derecho.Nicolás López Calera - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:123-148.
Reconsidering the private–public distinction.Gurpreet Mahajan - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2):133-143.
Fences: Rorty’s Private-public-dichotomy As A Situational Game.Michael Dellwing - 2012 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 16:62-82.
Private Equity and the Public Good.Kevin Morrell & Ian Clark - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):249 - 263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-13

Downloads
44 (#317,940)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Moral Concern in the Legalist State.Brandon King - 2020 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 19 (3):391-407.
Public and private interests in Han Fei: A statist approach.Yutang Jin - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references