Mutual Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: a Deflationary Account

&
Philosophy and Technology 33 (1):53-70 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mutually adaptive interaction involves the robot as a partner as opposed to a tool, and requires that the robot is susceptible to similar environmental cues and behavior patterns as humans are. Recognition, or the acknowledgement of the other as individual, is fundamental to mutually adaptive interaction between humans. We discuss what recognition involves and its behavioral manifestations, and describe the benefits of implementing it in HRI.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s13347-018-0339-x

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mutual Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: a Deflationary Account.Ingar Brinck & Christian Balkenius - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 1 (1):53-70.
Systematic analysis of video data from different human–robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations.Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner & Manfred Tscheligi - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments.Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina Pop, Lavinia Jisa, Sebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu & Daniel O. David - 2012 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 13 (3):315-347.
The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction.Marcell Székely, Henry Powell, Fabio Vannucci, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti & John Michael - 2019 - Interaction Studies 20 (2):234-255.
Temporal patterns in multi-modal social interaction between elderly users and service robot.Ning Wang, Alessandro Di Nuovo, Angelo Cangelosi & Ray Jones - 2019 - Interaction Studies 20 (1):4-24.
Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments.Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina Pop, Lavinia Jisa, Sebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu & Daniel O. David - 2012 - Interaction Studies 13 (3):315-347.
There is no 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (expanded & revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
Are robots like people?: Relationships between participant and robot personality traits in human–robot interaction studies.Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Christina Kaouri, René te Boekhorst, Kheng Lee Koay & Michael L. Walters - 2007 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 8 (2):281-305.
Robot-Human Interaction - How Robot Approach Behaviors Affect Human Perception of a Robot's Character and Role.Komori Masashi & Nagaoka Chika - unknown
Exploring the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile communication with a robot using Bayesian networks.Jungsik Hwang & Kun Chang Lee - 2015 - Interaction Studies 16 (1):29-53.
Exploring the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile communication with a robot using Bayesian networks.Jungsik Hwang & Kun Chang Lee - 2015 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 16 (1):29-53.
The effects of exposure to different social robots on attitudes toward preferences.Evgenios Vlachos, Elizabeth Jochum & Louis-Philippe Demers - 2016 - Interaction Studies 17 (3):390-404.
What is a Human?: Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human–robot interaction.Peter H. Kahn, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Batya Friedman, Takayuki Kanda, Nathan G. Freier, Rachel L. Severson & Jessica Miller - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):363-390.
Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Janek Dubowski - 2006 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 7 (3):479-512.
Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability.Robert Rose, Matthias Scheutz & Paul Schermerhorn - 2010 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 11 (2):314-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-10

Downloads
358 (#53,426)

6 months
107 (#34,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ingar Brinck
Lund University
Christian Balkenius
Lund University

Citations of this work

Understanding Sophia? On human interaction with artificial agents.Thomas Fuchs - 2024 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (1):21-42.
Robotification & ethical cleansing.Marco Nørskov - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):425-441.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Phenomenology of the Social World.Alfred Schutz - 1967 - Northwestern University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references