Legal Interpretation, Objectivity and Morality

In Brian Leiter (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press. pp. 12--65 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Objectivity in law.Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (3):240-249.
Naturalizing jurisprudence: essays on American legal realism and naturalism in legal philosophy.Brian Leiter - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Adams, David M." Objectivity, Moral Truth, and Constitutional Doctrine: A Comment on R. George Wright's' Is Natural Law Theory of Any Use in Constitutional Interpretation?'" Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 4 (1995): 489-500. Alexander, Larry, and Ken Kress." Against Legal Principles," in A. Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. [REVIEW]Robert L. Arrington & Realism Rationalism - 2001 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press. pp. 4--331.
Law and interpretation: essays in legal philosophy.Andrei Marmor (ed.) - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is Law’s Conventionality Consistent with Law’s Objectivity?Matthew H. Kramer - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (4):241-252.
Science, Objectivity, Morality.Morality Objectivity - 1999 - In E. L. Cerroni-Long (ed.), Anthropological Theory in North America. Bergin & Garvey. pp. 77.
The Nine Lives of Legal Interpretation.Bruce Anderson - 2010 - Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 5:30-36.
The Necessary Connection between Law and Morality.Tony Honoré - 2002 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (3):489-495.
Morality as Interpretation:Interpretation and Social Criticism. Michael Walzer.Joseph Raz - 1991 - Ethics 101 (2):392-.
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
Defending objectivity: essays in honour of Andrew Collier.Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Retracing One’s Steps: Searching for the Ethics of Legal Interpretation. [REVIEW]Susanna Lindroos-Hovinheimo - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):163-178.
Legal theory, legal interpretation, and judicial review.David O. Brink - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):105-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Brink
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Naturalism in legal philosophy.Brian Leiter - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Retributivism and Legal Moralism.David O. Brink - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (4):496-512.
Liberty and the constitution.Michael S. Moore - 2015 - Legal Theory 21 (3-4):156-241.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references