Constructive notions of strict convexity

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):295-300 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two classically equivalent, but constructively inequivalent, strict convexity properties of a preference relation are discussed, and conditions given under which the stronger notion is a consequence of the weaker. The last part of the paper introduces uniformly rotund preferences, and shows that uniform rotundity implies strict convexity. The paper is written from a strictly constructive point of view, in which all proofs embody algorithms. MSC: 03F60, 90A06

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uniform Continuity Properties of Preference Relations.Douglas S. Bridges - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (1):97-106.
Convexity and Differentiability of Controlled Risk.L. I. Krechetov - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (4):291-307.
A Defense of Strict Finitism.J. P. Bendegem - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):141-149.
Compactness notions for an apartness space.Douglas S. Bridges - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):517-534.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Constructive notions of equicontinuity.Douglas S. Bridges - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (5):437-448.
Counterfactuals as Strict Conditionals.Andrea Iacona - 2015 - Disputatio 7 (41):165-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Constructive Analysis.Errett Bishop & Douglas Bridges - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (4):1047-1048.

Add more references