Between professional values, social regulations and patient preferences: medical doctors' perceptions of ethical dilemmas

Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2017-104408 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background We present and discuss the results of a Norwegian survey of medical doctors' views on potential ethical dilemmas in professional practice. Methods The study was conducted in 2015 as a postal questionnaire to a representative sample of 1612 doctors, among which 1261 responded. We provided a list of 41 potential ethical dilemmas and asked whether each was considered a dilemma, and whether the doctor would perform the task, if in a position to do so. Conceptually, dilemmas arise because of tensions between two or more of four doctor roles: the patient’s advocate, a steward of societal interests, a member of a profession and a private individual. Results 27 of the potential dilemmas were considered dilemmas by at least 50% of the respondents. For more than half of the dilemmas, the anticipated course of action varied substantially within the professional group, with at least 20% choosing a different course than their colleagues, indicating low consensus in the profession. Conclusions Doctors experience a large range of ethical dilemmas, of which many have been given little attention by academic medical ethics. The less-discussed dilemmas are characterised by a low degree of consensus in the profession about how to handle them. There is a need for medical ethicists, medical education, postgraduate courses and clinical ethics support to address common dilemmas in clinical practice. Viewing dilemmas as role conflicts can be a fruitful approach to these discussions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral distress among Norwegian doctors.R. Forde & O. G. Aasland - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):521-525.
Medical ethics and medical practice: a social science view.M. Stacey - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (1):14-18.
Professional ethics--for whose benefit?P. Sieghart - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (1):25-32.
The junior doctor as ethically unique.R. McDougall - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):268-270.
Doctors' dilemmas: moral conflict and medical care.Samuel Gorovitz - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Social Work Values and Ethics.Frederic G. Reamer - 2018 - Columbia University Press.
Bioethics and the humanities: attitudes and perceptions.R. S. Downie - 2007 - New York: Routledge-Cavendish. Edited by Jane Macnaughton.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-20

Downloads
23 (#584,438)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?