Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):123-136 (2004)

Abstract
Departing from frequent use of moral conflict cases in business ethics teaching and research, the paper suggests an elaboration of a moral conflict approach within business ethics, both conceptually and philosophically. The conceptual elaboration borrows from social science conflict research terminology, while the philosophical elaboration presents casuistry as a kind of practical, inductive argumentation with a focus on paradigmatic examples.
Keywords case approach  casuistry  conflict management  ethics teaching  moral conflict
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039413.49897.d4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics.Stephen Toulmin - 1982 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 25 (4):736-750.
Casuistry and the Business Case Method.Martin Calkins - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Putting Ethics on the Agenda for Real Estate Agents.Johannes Brinkmann - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):65-82.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #183,185 of 2,519,571 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,571 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes