A comparison between Dooyeweerd and Vollehoven on the historiography of philosophy

Philosophia Reformata 60 (2):121-146 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The founders of reformational philosophy, H. Dooyeweerd and D.H.Th. Vollenhoven, each published in short succession, viz. 1949 and 1950, a voluminous study in the history of philosophy. Whoever reads both works is struck by the remarkable differences in treatment. In this contribution these differences are analysed, but there is also indication of agreement. The article ends with a number of conclusions based on the analysis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Theme from the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd.Hendrik Hart - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):268-282.
Rede, religie en de mogelijkheid Van christelijke filosofie.R. Van Woudenberg - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (2):267 - 296.
Kuhnian Consensus & Historiography.Adam Timmins - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (1):82-105.
Feelings in history, ancient and modern.Ramsay MacMullen - 2003 - Claremont, Calif.: Regina Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
16 (#851,323)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?