An Analysis of Student Privacy Rights in the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1255-1266 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Plagiarism detection services are a powerful tool to help encourage academic integrity. Adoption of these services has proven to be controversial due to ethical concerns about students’ rights. Central to these concerns is the fact that most such systems make permanent archives of student work to be re-used in plagiarism detection. This computerization and automation of plagiarism detection is changing the relationships of trust and responsibility between students, educators, educational institutions, and private corporations. Educators must respect student privacy rights when implementing such systems. Student work is personal information, not the property of the educator or institution. The student has the right to be fully informed about how plagiarism detection works, and the fact that their work will be permanently archived as a result. Furthermore, plagiarism detection should not be used if the permanent archiving of a student’s work may expose him or her to future harm

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Instructional Challenges of Student Plagiarism.Erika Löfström & Pauliina Kupila - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242.
Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use?Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
A Moral Case Against Certain Uses of Plagiarism Detection Services.J. Caleb Clanton - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):17-26.
Plagiarism.Richard Reilly, Samuel Pry & Mark L. Thomas - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):269-282.
The Wrongs of Plagiarism.Brook J. Sadler - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):283-291.
Employee Monitoring and Computer Technology.Adam D. Moore - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):697-709.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
The right to privacy.Janet E. Smith - 2008 - San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-23

Downloads
60 (#256,806)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?