Should observed overconfidence be dismissed as a statistical artifact? Critique of Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994)

Psychological Review 107 (4):943-946 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Decisions based on verbal and numerical probabilities.Dv Budescu, S. Weinberg & Ts Wallsten - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):332-332.
Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. [REVIEW]Deborah G. Johnson - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):195-204.
Economists as experts: Overconfidence in theory and practice.Erik Angner - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):1-24.
Artifact Categorization. Trends and Problems.Massimiliano Carrara & Daria Mingardo - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):351-373.
“Bouncing back” from a loss: A statistical artifact.Thomas R. Zentall - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (5):384-386.
Beliefs about overconfidence.Sandra Ludwig & Julia Nafziger - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (4):475-500.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
10 (#1,160,791)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Being Rational and Being Wrong.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references