Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use?

Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Self-plagiarism requires clear definition within an environment that places integrity at the heart of the research enterprise. This paper explores the whole notion of self-plagiarism by academics and distinguishes between appropriate and inappropriate textual re-use in academic publications, while considering research on other forms of plagiarism such as student plagiarism. Based on the practical experience of the authors in identifying academics’ self-plagiarism using both electronic detection and manual analysis, a simple model is proposed for identifying self-plagiarism by academics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plagiarism and the news media.Marie Dunne White - 1989 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):265 – 280.
How do high school students justify internet plagiarism?Dominic A. Sisti - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231.
Plagiarism.Richard Reilly, Samuel Pry & Mark L. Thomas - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):269-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-07

Downloads
176 (#107,638)

6 months
25 (#111,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Publishing programs and moral dilemmas.I. L. Horowitz - 1997 - Journal of Information Ethics 6 (1).
Multiple publication reconsidered.Joseph S. Fulda - 1998 - Journal of Information Ethics 7 (2):47-53.

Add more references