Rawls' Paradox

Constitutional Political Economy 18:287-299 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rawls’ theory of justice is paradoxical, for it requires a society to aim directly to maximize the basic goods received by the least advantaged even if directly aiming is self-defeating. Rawls’ reasons for rejecting capitalist systems commit him to holding that a society must not merely maximize the goods received by the least advantaged, but must do so via specific institutions. By Rawls’ own premises, in the long run directly aiming to satisfy the difference principle is contrary to the interests of the poor, though it is meant to aid them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The difference principle and time.Daniel Attas - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):209-232.
Fair Equality of Opportunity.Larry A. Alexander - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as fair Rights”.Rodney G. Peffer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
Against Rawlsian equality of opportunity.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Procedural versus substantive justice: Rawls and Nozick.David Lewis Schaefer - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):164-186.
Rawls on global distributive justice: a defence.Joseph Heath - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (sup1):193-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-28

Downloads
210 (#92,412)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references