Morality Games

Philosophy Now 137:58-58 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A dialogue arguing that morality has an objective basis in the mathematical object describing the "tit for tat" game theory. To play the game, a contractual obligation is freely made to cooperate and to fairly distribute the gains. Failure to meet these obligations results in social punishment.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gaarder and Schick Play Games.John Lipczynski & Zhou Li-Yang - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 2 (2):58-58.
Gaarder and Schick Play Games. [REVIEW]John Lipczynski & Zhou Li-Yang - 1998 - The Philosophers' Magazine 2:58-58.
The Place of Self-Interest in Morality.Jos Philips - 2015 - Philosophy Now 108:36-37.
Nietzsche and Morality.Roger Caldwell - 2008 - Philosophy Now 70:44-45.
The Morality of Divorce.Justin MacBrayer - 2017 - Philosophy Now 120:33-35.
Meaning & Morality in Modernity.Andrew Brower Latz - 2015 - Philosophy Now 106:33-35.
Problems of Affluence in Morality.Kevin Smith - 2002 - Philosophy Now 38:28-31.
Einstein’s Morality.Ching-Hung Woo - 2015 - Philosophy Now 109:10-13.
Morality, Belief and Responsibility.Grahame Jackson - 1995 - Philosophy Now 14:30-31.
Ethics versus Morality.Anja Steinbauer - 2000 - Philosophy Now 26:9-9.
The Foundations of Morality.Michael Williams - 2002 - Philosophy Now 38 (1):44-44.
AIDS and Sexual Morality.Piers Benn - 1992 - Philosophy Now 4:5-8.
The Anachronism of Morality.Innes Crellin - 1995 - Philosophy Now 14:9-12.
Wilde and Morality.Peter Benson - 2008 - Philosophy Now 65:28-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
155 (#113,488)

6 months
53 (#70,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references