Contra Static Dispositions

Metaphysica 22 (2):285-294 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Work on dispositions focuses chiefly on dispositions that are manifested in dynamic causal processes. Williams, Neil. 2005. “Static and Dynamic Dispositions.” Synthese 146: 303–24 has argued that the focus on dynamic dispositions has been at the expense of a richer ontology of dispositions. He contends that we ought to distinguish between dynamic and static dispositions. The manifestation of a dynamic disposition involves some change in the world. The manifestation of a static disposition does not involve any change in the world. In this paper, we concede that making a conceptual distinction between dynamic and static dispositions is useful and we allow that we can truthfully represent objects as manifesting static dispositions. However, we argue that the distinction is not ontologically deep. Rather, the truthmakers for our representations of static dispositions are actually dynamic dispositions to whose manifestations we may fail to be sensitive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-10

Downloads
27 (#142,020)

6 months
19 (#786,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrei Buckareff
Marist College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephen Mumford.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar & Stephen Mumford - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):485-487.
Static And Dynamic Dispositions.Neil Edward Williams - 2005 - Synthese 146 (3):303-324.
Dispositions as categorical states.David M. Armstrong - 1996 - In Tim Crane, D. M. Armstrong & C. B. Martin (eds.), Dispositions: A Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 15--18.

Add more references