Animals in Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Law: Tort and Ethical Laws

Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2):166-181 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the attitude toward animals in the Pentateuch and ancient Near Eastern legal codes. Employing a comparative approach, it analyzes criminal and tort law in relation to animals and their carers—stealing and finding animals used in factory farms, the responsibility of watchmen and renters, and that of the legal “owners” of animals who cause damage. Demonstrating how animals form part of the biblical ethical system, in which ethical demands become binding statutes, it looks at why this process only occurred in the Hebrew Bible and not in other ancient Near Eastern cultures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biblical Animality After Jacques Derrida.Hannah M. Strømmen - 2018 - Society of Biblical Literature.
Mens Rea in tort law.Cane Peter - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):533-556.
Approaching Ancient Near Eastern Treaties, Laws, and Covenants.Jacob Lauinger - 2021 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 136 (1):125.
Visibility and Invisibility of Animals in Traditional Chinese Philosophy and Law.Deborah Cao - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (3):351-367.
Philosophical issues in tort law.John Oberdiek - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):734-748.
Animal Rights: A Historical Anthology.Andrew Linzey & Paul Barry Clarke (eds.) - 2004 - Columbia University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?