A Burden of Means

Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 26 (2):183-200 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THIS ESSAY FIRST PRESENTS GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETING magisterial documents using Lumen gentium's triple criteria of considering the character, manner, and frequency of magisterial teaching in order to better determine its relative authority and weight. Next, these criteria are applied to a close reading of Pope John Paul Il's various documents that deal with end-of-life issues, especially his controversial March 2004 address to the participants in the International Congress on Life-Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas. This analysis concludes that the pope did not in fact assert that artificial hydration and nutrition had to be used in virtually every medical case, such as patients diagnosed to be in a persistent vegetative state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Burden of Proof.James Cargile - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (279):59 - 83.
Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews.Corina Andone - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1):74-87.
Burden of Proof Rules in Social Criticism.Juha Räikkä - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):463-477.
Fodor's Theory of Content: Problems and Objections.William Seager - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):262-277.
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-13

Downloads
4 (#1,412,744)

6 months
2 (#650,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Islam and bioethics.Jonathan E. Brockopp - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (1):3-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references