- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What are the most common reasons for return of ethics submissions? An audit of an Australian health service ethics committee
Research Ethics 17 (3):346-358 (2021)
Abstract
One of the key criticisms of the ethical review process is the time taken to decision, and associated resource use. A key source of delay is that most submissions are required to respond to at leas...My notes
Similar books and articles
Local Research Ethics Committees can audit ethical standards in research.J. Berry - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
Improving Australia’s ethical review processes — slow and steady wins the race.Kerry J. Breen - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S58-S62.
Management Attempts to Avoid Accounting Disclosure Oversight: The Effects of Trust and Knowledge on Corporate Directors’ Governance Ability.Anna M. Rose & Jacob M. Rose - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):193-205.
Multidisciplinary insights on the evolving role of the ethics committee in an Australian regional hospital.Pam McGrath - 2006 - Monash Bioethics Review 25 (3):S59-S72.
Psychoanalysis and analytic psychotherapy in the NHS--a problem for medical ethics.G. Wilkinson - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (2):87-94.
Does Industry Regulation Matter? New Evidence on Audit Committees and Earnings Management.Lerong He & Rong Yang - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 123 (4):573-589.
Management attempts to avoid accounting disclosure oversight: The effects of trust and knowledge on corporate directors' governance ability. [REVIEW]Anna M. Rose & Jacob M. Rose - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):193 - 205.
Ethics of research involving humans: Uniform processes for disparate categories?Malcolm Parker, Jim Holt, Graeme Turner & Jack Broerse - 2003 - Monash Bioethics Review 22 (3):S50-S65.
A clinical ethics committee in a small health service trust.K. A. Wood & S. Ellis - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (5):420-420.
The relationship between clinical audit and ethics.S. Kinn - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):250-253.
Ethics, management, and mythology: rational decision making for health service professionals.Michael Loughlin - 2002 - Abingdon, Oxon, U.K.: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Clinical audit and reform of the UK research ethics review system.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?Rasheda Begum & Simon Kolstoe - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.
Clinical ethics services in Australia.Dilinie Herbert - 2015 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 21 (1):3.
The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia.Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):491-493.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-03-11
Downloads
17 (#849,202)
6 months
11 (#225,837)
2021-03-11
Downloads
17 (#849,202)
6 months
11 (#225,837)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Psychology, ethics, and research ethics boards.Donald Sharpe & Julie Ziemer - 2022 - Ethics and Behavior 32 (8):658-673.
Better Mechanisms Are Needed to Oversee HREC Reviews.Lisa Eckstein, Rebekah McWhirter & Cameron Stewart - 2022 - Public Health Ethics 15 (2):200-203.
References found in this work
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.Carl H. Coleman & Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):6-.
Opening Closed Doors: Promoting IRB Transparency.Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (1):145-158.
The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee.Simeon E. H. Davies - 2020 - Research Ethics 16 (1-2):1-26.
Improving the process of research ethics review.Jeffrey Nyeboer & Stacey A. Page - 2017 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (1).
Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?E. Angell & M. Dixon-Woods - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):130-132.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo