Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation

Philosophy of Science 84 (1):115-159 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Polarization is a topic of intense interest among social scientists, but there is significant disagreement regarding the character of the phenomenon and little understanding of underlying mechanics. A first problem, we argue, is that polarization appears in the literature as not one concept but many. In the first part of the article, we distinguish nine phenomena that may be considered polarization, with suggestions of appropriate measures for each. In the second part of the article, we apply this analysis to evaluate the types of polarization generated by the three major families of computational models proposing specific mechanisms of opinion polarization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why did John Herschel fail to understand polarization? The differences between object and event concepts.Xiang Chen - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):491-513.
Infostorms.Pelle G. Hansen, Vincent F. Hendricks & Rasmus K. Rendsvig - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (3):301-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-14

Downloads
130 (#136,727)

6 months
34 (#98,824)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Daniel J. Singer
University of Pennsylvania
Patrick Grim
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Aaron Bramson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (PhD)

References found in this work

A formal theory of social power.John R. P. French - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (3):181-194.

Add more references