Review of Metaphysics 51 (1):136-137 (1997)

“This book is a philosophical interpretation of Macbeth,” the preface states. It is not a theoretical reading, that is, an application of literary theory to uncover implications in the text that the author may not have consciously put there. The hypothesis of Jan Blits’s philosophical interpretation is that we are only to find out what Shakespeare has put in with infinitely conscious art and that theory is not to be imposed on, but philosophy is to be discerned in, the play. “Philosophy” here means the reflective content of each line, not necessarily understood by the speaker, but intended by Shakespeare to serve the reader in thinking about humanity and its circumstances, natural and divine.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph199751194
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue and Luck, Epistemic and Otherwise.John Greco - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (3):353-366.
Examining Loyalty: The Folk & The Philosopher.John D. Baldari - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno
Virtue Epistemology.Jason S. Baehr - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Virtue Ethics and Virtue Epistemology.Roger Crisp - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):22-40.
Human Insufficiency in Shinran and Kierkegaard.Joel R. Smith - 1996 - Asian Philosophy 6 (2):117 – 127.
The Insufficiency of Nomological Explanation.Daniel M. Hausman - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (154):22-35.
Virtue Ethics.Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Kant's Conception of Virtue.Lara Denis - 2006 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
2. The Whole Risk for a Human Being: On the Insufficiency of Apollo.James V. Schall - 2004 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 7 (2).
Character, Reliability and Virtue Epistemology.Jason Baehr - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):193–212.
Moral Virtues, Epistemic Virtues, and the Big Five.Christian Miller - 2014 - In Flanagan Owen & Fairweather Abrol (eds.), Naturalizing Virtue. Cambridge University Press. pp. 92-117.
Equality, Freedom, and the Insufficiency of Empiricism.Charles Hartshorne - 1970 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):20-27.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #735,344 of 2,520,355 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,520,355 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes