The Early Reception of Berkeley's Inmaterialism: 1710-1733

Hague : M. Nijhoff (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX


By the time of Immanuel Kant, Berkeley had been caIled, among other things, a sceptic, an atheist, a solipsist, and an idealist. In our own day, however, the suggestion has been ad vanced that Berkeley is bett er understood if interpreted as a realist and man of common sense. Regardless of whether in the end one decides to treat hirn as a subjective idealist or as a re alist, I think it has become appropriate to inquire how Berkeley's own contemporaries viewed his philosophy. Heretofore the gen erally accepted account has been that they ignored hirn, roughly from the time he published the Principles 01 Human Knowledge until1733 when Andrew Baxter's criticism appeared. The aim of the present study is to correct that account as weIl as to give some indication not only of the extent, but more important, the role and character of several of the earliest discussions. Second arily, I have tried to give some clues as to the influence this early material may have had in forming the image of the "good" Bish op that emerged in the second half of the eighteenth century. For it is my hope that such clues may prove helpful in freeing us from the more severe strictures of the traditional interpretive dogmas.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Apologetics of George Berkeley.James Sanford Spiegel - 1993 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Berkeley and Irish philosophy.David Berman - 2005 - New York: Thoemmes Continuum.
The querist.George Berkeley - 1735 - Arc Manor LLC.


Added to PP

12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references