Testimony and Intersubjectivity

Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):35-43 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following a brief examination of some remarks by Paul Ricoeur on the notion of testimony. I provide the outline or an analysis of revelation based upon certain key concepts of process philosophy. This is followed by a more specific interpretation within the context of Whitehead’s philosophy of process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Revelation.Rolfe King - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (7):495-505.
History as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):293-304.
George Campbell's Critique of Hume on Testimony.Tony Pitson - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (1):1-15.
Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
Divine self-testimony and the knowledge of God.Rolfe King - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):279-295.
The Epistemic Norms of Intra-Scientific Testimony.Mikkel Gerken - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (6):568-595.
Is Ricoeur a Process Philosopher?J. R. Hustwit - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (1):55-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#318,154)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references