Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (6):394-400 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simulations are used in very different contexts and for very different purposes. An emerging development is the possibility of using simulations to obtain a more or less representative reproduction of organs or even entire persons. Such simulations are framed and discussed using the term ‘digital twin’. This paper unpacks and scrutinises the current use of such digital twins in medicine and the ideas embedded in this practice. First, the paper maps the different types of digital twins. A special focus is put on the concrete challenges inherent in the interactions between persons and their digital twin. Second, the paper addresses the questions of how far a digital twin can represent a person and what the consequences of this may be. Against the background of these two analytical steps, the paper defines first conditions for digital twins to take on an ethically justifiable form of representation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representation in digital systems.Vincent C. Müller - 2008 - In Adam Briggle, Katinka Waelbers & Brey Philip (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. IOS Press. pp. 116-121.
The Digital Phenotype: a Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.
Understanding Digital Ethics: Cases and Contexts.Jonathan Beever, Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick - 2019 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick.
Allowing digital piracy for strategic benefits to businesses.Halimin Herjanto, Sanjaya S. Gaur, Chayanin Saransomrurtai & Wee Hock Quik - 2014 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (4):314-322.
The contradictions of digital modernity.Kieron O’Hara - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):197-208.
The Ethics of the Digital Commons.Christian Fuchs - 2020 - Journal of Media Ethics 35 (2):112-126.
Digital Forensics.Stefan Meier - 2018 - In Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau & Tassilo Singer (eds.), Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies. Springer Verlag. pp. 129-145.
Digital footprints: an emerging dimension of digital inequality.Marina Micheli, Christoph Lutz & Moritz Büchi - 2018 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (3):242-251.
Circles: Networks of Reading.Massimo Lollini - 2015 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 4 (1):1-34.
Digital hermeneutics: an outline. [REVIEW]Rafael Capurro - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (1):35-42.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).
Digital humanities, digital hegemony.John D. Martin & Carolyn Runyon - 2016 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 46 (1):20-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-16

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.Mark Ryan - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2749-2767.
Virtual action.Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):317-330.

Add more references