Rules in relevant logic — II: Formula representation

Studia Logica 52 (4):565 - 585 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper surveys the various forms of Deduction Theorem for a broad range of relevant logics. The logics range from the basic system B of Routley-Meyer through to the system R of relevant implication, and the forms of Deduction Theorem are characterized by the various formula representations of rules that are either unrestricted or restricted in certain ways. The formula representations cover the iterated form,A 1 .A 2 . ... .A n B, the conjunctive form,A 1&A 2 & ...A n B, the combined conjunctive and iterated form, enthymematic version of these three forms, and the classical implicational form,A 1&A 2& ...A n B. The concept of general enthymeme is introduced and the Deduction Theorem is shown to apply for rules essentially derived using Modus Ponens and Adjunction only, with logics containing either (A B)&(B C) .A C orA B .B C .A C.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modal logic as metalogic.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (3):173-201.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
The proofs of α→α in P - W.Sachio Hirokawa - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):195-211.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Harmonising Natural Deduction.Hartley Slater - 2008 - Synthese 163 (2):187 - 198.
Metalogic of Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus.Alex Citkin - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):485-502.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#284,906)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.
From Hilbert proofs to consecutions and back.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (2):51-72.
Logic or Reason?Penelope Rush - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (2):127-163.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication.Alasdair Urquhart - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1059-1073.
Completeness of relevant quantification theories.Robert K. Meyer, J. Michael Dunn & Hugues Leblanc - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):97-121.
The gentzenization and decidability of RW.Ross T. Brady - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (1):35 - 73.
Multisets and Relevant Implication.R. K. Meyer - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60:107.

View all 14 references / Add more references