Profiting with Honor: Cicero’s Vision of Leadership

Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):21-33 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article attempts to uncover the relevance of Cicero’s thought to present-day management through an analysis of his last philosophical study, On Duties. Applying a methodology grounded in Socratic skepticism, Cicero synthesizes the Stoics and Aristotle to create his own moral theory. From this theory, we derive a Ciceronian set of recommended traits that make up a model business leader. Central to this model is the recognition that there are two lodestars in life, the beneficial and the honorable. The first directs each of us to attend to our personal happiness, and the second to our moral worth. In Cicero’s view, the life of leading sizable associations is what best satisfies this dual imperative. The honor of a business leader is secured by the practice of four virtues: wisdom, justice, greatness of spirit, and seemliness. A leader properly seeks his/her own benefit by recognizing that success comes from the relationships he/she establishes and that he/she are more apt to cultivate these by being virtuous. Cicero is not so naïve as to fail to see that the beneficial and the honorable may come into tension, noting various examples from business to illustrate the dilemma. But he insists a businessperson can be ethical and prosper at the same time once he/she comprehends the social fellowship of humanity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Profiting with Honor: Cicero’s Vision of Leadership. [REVIEW]George Bragues - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):21 - 33.
Honor as a motive for making sacrifices.Peter Olsthoorn - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (3):183-197.
Honor: a phenomenology.Robert L. Oprisko - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
Honor in Political and Moral Philosophy.Peter Olsthoorn - 2015 - New York: State University of New York Press.
Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership.Kim Cameron - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):25-35.
Leadership Ethics.Joanne B. Ciulla - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):5-28.
How machiavellian is cicero?David S. Fott - 2008 - In Harvey Claflin Mansfield, Sharon R. Krause & Mary Ann McGrail (eds.), The Arts of Rule: Essays in Honor of Harvey Mansfield. Lexington Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

B. R. George
University of California, Los Angeles (PhD)

References found in this work

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Complete Works: The Rev. Oxford Translation.Jonathan Barnes (ed.) - 1984 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.
Cicero's Social and Political Thought.Neal Wood - 1988 - University of California Press.
Cicero's Paradoxes and His Idea of Utility.Walter Nicgorski - 1984 - Political Theory 12 (4):557-578.

View all 7 references / Add more references