Not Just for Experts: The Public Debate about Reprogenetics in Germany

Hastings Center Report 35 (3):42 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When reproductive and genetic technologies spurred an extended German policy debate, the issues at stake went beyond the technologies to include the very meaning of “ethics” and the respective roles of ethicists and of the public in thinking about ethical questions.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3528805

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Not just for experts: The public debate about reprogenetics in germany.Kathrin Braun - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (3):42-49.
From Ethical Exceptionalism to Ethical Exceptions: The Rule and exception Model and the Changing Meaning of Ethics In German Bioregulation.Kathrin Braun - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics 17 (3):146-156.
Lay expertise: why involve the public in biobank governance?Bjørn K. Myskja - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1):1-16.
Virology Experts in the Boundary Zone Between Science, Policy and the Public: A Biographical Analysis.Erwin van Rijswoud - 2010 - Minerva 48 (2):145-167.
The limits of liberal choice:Racial selection and reprogenetics.Camisha Russell - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (s1):97-108.
Special Supplement: Reprogenetics and Public Policy: Reflections and Recommendations.Erik Parens & Lori P. Knowles - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (4):S1.
Doctor-cared dying instead of physician-assisted suicide: a perspective from Germany. [REVIEW]Fuat S. Oduncu & Stephan Sahm - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (4):371-381.
Obstacles or motors of Europeanization? German media and the transnationalization of public debate.Barbara Pfetsch & Ruud Koopmans - 2006 - Communications 31 (2):115-138.
Motives and Implementation: On the Design of Mechanisms to Elicit Opinions.Jacob Glazer & Ariel Rubinstein - unknown
Motives and implementation: On the design of mechanisms to elicit opinions.Ariel Rubinstein - manuscript
Putting political experts to the test.Zeljka Buturovic - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):389-396.
Consensus of expertise: The role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts.Robert M. Veatch - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
Verhütung als Mittel gegen Bevölkerungswachstum. Expertendiskussion und öffentliche Debatten in Westdeutschland in den 1960er Jahren.Eva-Maria Silies - 2010 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 33 (3):246-262.
On the German debate on human embryonic stem cell research.Jan P. Beckmann - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):603 – 621.
Social Reactions to the Climate Debate in Germany and Switzerland.Axel Franzen & Dominikus Vogl - 2010 - Analyse & Kritik 32 (1):121-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-11

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Politics Deals with Expert Dissent: The Case of Ethics Councils.Wolfgang Menz & Alexander Bogner - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6):888-914.
Evidence, ethics and inclusion: a broader base for NICE. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):111-121.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references