Goodness and Justice [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1):233-243 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Goodness and Justice, Joseph Mendola defends three related views in normative ethics: a novel form of consequentialism, a Bentham-style hedonism about “basic” value, and a maximin principle about the value of a world. In defending these views he draws on his views in metaethics, action theory, and the philosophy of mind. It is an ambitious and wide-ranging book. I begin with a quick explanation of Mendola’s views, and then raise some problems

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-13

Downloads
49 (#310,442)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Bradley
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Good and bad actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
A Problem for Utilitarianism.Hector-Neri Castaneda - 1968 - Analysis 28 (4):141 - 142.

Add more references