Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:75-87 (2012)
AbstractFrom the standpoint of belief in divine freedom , the medieval Aristotelian understanding of divine simplicity is deeply problematic. This is for two reasons. First, if the divine will and wisdom are identical, it would seem that God’s action must be wholly determined by His rational apprehension of the good. Second, if the divine will is identical with the divine essence, it would seem that for God to be able to do other than He does would mean that the divine essence could be different. This paper focuses on two leading medieval Jewish Aristotelians, Maimonides and Gersonides, to ascertain their approach to these issues
Similar books and articles
Simply Impossible: A Case Against Divine Simplicity.R. T. Mullins - 2013 - Journal of Reformed Theology 7 (2):181-203.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
The Deadlock of Absolute Divine Simplicity.Yann Schmitt - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Mu‘Tazilites, Al-Ash‘Ari and Maimonides on Divine Attributes.Catarina Belo - 2007 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 52 (3):117-131.
Response To: Divine Responsibility Without Divine Freedom. [REVIEW]William L. Rowe - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (1):37 - 48.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity and Divine Freedom.Brian Leftow - 2009 - In Kevin Timpe & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. Routledge.
Gersonides: Judaism Within the Limits of Reason.Seymour Feldman - 2010 - Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths: Descartes and the Scholastics.Andrew Pessin - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):69-105.
Method and Metaphysics in Maimonides' Guide for the Perplexed.Daniel Davies - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Divine Simplicity, Contingent Truths, and Extrinsic Models of Divine Knowing.W. Matthews Grant - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):254-274.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads