What is seen and what is not seen in the economy: An effect of our evolved psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e191 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Specific features of our evolved cognitive architecture explain why some aspects of the economy are “seen” and others are “not seen.” Drawing from the commentaries of economists, psychologists, and other social scientists on our original proposal, we propose a more precise model of the acquisition and spread of folk-beliefs about the economy. In particular, we try to provide a clearer delimitation of the field of folk-economic beliefs (sect. R2) and to dispel possible misunderstandings of the role of variation in evolutionary psychology (sect. R3). We also comment on the difficulty of explaining folk-economic beliefs in terms of domain-general processes or biases (sect. R4), as developmental studies show how encounters with specific environments calibrate domain-specific systems (sect. R5). We offer a more detailed description of the connections between economic beliefs and political psychology (sect. R6) and of the probable causes of individual variation in that domain (sect. R7). Taken together, these arguments point to a better integration or consilience between economics and human evolution (sect. R8).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Instrumentalism in psychology.William Seager - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):191 – 203.
Selectionist Approaches in Evolutionary Linguistics: An Epistemological Analysis.Nathalie Gontier - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):67 - 95.
Dion’s Left Foot (and the Price of Burkean Economy).W. R. Carter - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):371-379.
Can evolution explain insanity?Dominic Murphy - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):745-766.
Humans evolved to become homo negotiatus . . . The rest followed.Philippe Rochat - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):714-715.
Dion’s Left Foot (and the Price of Burkean Economy).W. R. Carter - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):371-379.
The Guru Effect.Dan Sperber - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):583-592.
Dion’s Left Foot.W. R. Carter - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):371-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-31

Downloads
20 (#656,247)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations