Paediatric Physician–Researchers: Coping With Tensions in Dual Accountability

Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 2 (3):213-221 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Potential conflicts between the roles of physicians and researchers have been described at the theoretical level in the bioethics literature (Czoli, et al., 2011). Physicians and researchers are generally in mutually distinct roles, responsible for patients and participants respectively. With increasing emphasis on integration of research into clinical settings, however, the role divide is sometimes unclear. Consequently, physician–researchers must consider and negotiate salient ethical differences between clinical– and research–based obligations (Miller et al, 1998). This paper explores the subjective experiences and perspectives of 30 physician–researchers working in three Canadian paediatric settings. Drawing on qualitative interviews, it identifies ethical challenges and strategies used by physician–researchers in managing dual roles. It considers whether competing obligations could have both positive and adverse consequences for both physician–researchers and patients. Finally, we discuss how empirical work, which explores the perspectives of those engaged in research and clinical practice, can lead the way to understanding and promoting best practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,354

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Roles and Relationships.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (5):2-2.
Supererogation in clinical research.Deborah R. Barnbaum - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (3):343-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
7 (#1,418,331)

6 months
2 (#1,469,288)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references