Beyond politics: additional factors underlying skepticism of a COVID-19 vaccine

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (1):1-4 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Even before it had been developed there had already been skepticism among the general public concerning a vaccine for COVID-19. What are the factors that drive this skepticism? While much has been said about how political differences are at play, in this article I draw attention to two additional factors that have not received as much attention: witnessing the fallibility of the scientific process play out in real time, and a perceived breakdown of the distinction between experts and non-experts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines.Rohit Gupta & Stephanie R. Morain - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):137-141.
Exuberant skepticism.Paul Kurtz - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by John R. Shook.
Ethical considerations for epidemic vaccine trials.Joshua Teperowski Monrad - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):465-469.
A Critical Introduction to Skepticism.Allan Hazlett - 2014 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
The Value of Teaching Moral Skepticism.Daniel Callcut - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (3):223-235.
1% Skepticism.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):271-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-27

Downloads
34 (#448,660)

6 months
4 (#724,033)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth Boyd
University of Toronto, St. George Campus (PhD)

References found in this work

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Why trust science?Naomi Oreskes - 2019 - Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Add more references