The Incognito of a Thief: Johannes Climacus and the Poetics of Self-Incrimination

In Adam Buben, Eleanor Helms & Patrick Stokes (eds.), The Kierkegaardian Mind. London, UK: pp. 409-420 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this essay, I advance a reading of Philosophical Crumbs or a Crumb of Philosophy, published by Søren Kierkegaard under the pseudonym Johannes Climacus. I argue that this book is animated by a poetics of self-incrimination. Climacus keeps accusing himself of having stolen his words from someone else. In this way, he deliberately adopts the identity of a thief as an incognito. To understand this poetics of self-incrimination, I analyze the hypothetical thought-project that Climacus develops in an attempt to show what it means to go further than Socrates. In my reading, I distinguish between a Socratic and a non-Socratic conception of education, both of which rely on an incognito. Socrates takes on the maieutic incognito of an ignorant bystander in order to force his interlocutors to turn inward so that the truth that is already within them can be born. In contrast, the non-Socratic education that Climacus advances as a hypothesis relies on what I call ‘the incognito as a true form’. It is an incognito insofar as it confronts the pupils with a paradox on which the understanding runs aground. It is a true form insofar as its immediate appearance is not a disguise, but a true form. This indirect mode of communication is necessary, without it pupils will not be able to encounter a truth that is not inherent within them. Climacus’ poetics of self-incrimination, I argue, tries to repeat this indirect mode of communication by adopting the incognito of a thief as a true form.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard's Concepts: Incognito.Martijn Boven - 2014 - In Steven M. Emmanuel, Jon Stewart & William McDonald (eds.), Volume 15, Tome III: Kierkegaard's Concepts: Envy to Incognito. Ashgate. pp. 231-236.
Kierkegaard's Socratic Task.Paul Muench - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Understanding Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus in the Postscript.Paul Muench - 2007 - In Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Hermann Deuser & K. Brian Söderquist (eds.), Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. de Gruyter. pp. 424-440.
To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript. [REVIEW]John W. Elrod - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (1):120-121.
“Ne quid nimis‘. Kierkegaard and the Virtue of Temperance.Rob Compaijen - 2013 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 75 (3):455-485.
Illusion and satire in Kierkegaard's postscript.John Lippitt - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):451-466.


Added to PP

367 (#35,309)

6 months
46 (#38,288)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martijn Boven
Leiden University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references